Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42839261›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

Postoperative infection following volar locking plate fixation of closed distal radius fractures: a retrospective cohort study of infection rates and antibiotic prophylaxis practice.

Daniel Muder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel MuderDepartment of Surgical Sciences/Orthopaedics & Hand Surgery, Uppsala University, Entrance 70, Uppsala, SE-75185, Sweden. daniel.muder@uu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDistal radius fractures are among the most common surgically treated upper-extremity fractures, and volar locking plate fixation is the predominant operative technique. Although perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is widely used in orthopaedic surgery, procedure-specific evidence for closed distal radius fractures remains limited. Contemporary data regarding postoperative infection rates and antibiotic prophylaxis practice following volar locking plate fixation are scarce. The aim of this study was to describe postoperative infection rates following volar locking plate fixation of closed distal radius fractures and to report contemporary patterns of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis use in routine clinical practice.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included consecutive adult patients undergoing volar locking plate fixation for closed distal radius fractures at a single center between January 2022 and December 2024. Patients were grouped according to receipt of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, reflecting routine clinical practice rather than predefined treatment allocation. The primary outcome was postoperative surgical site infection within one year of surgery. Secondary analyses described antibiotic prophylaxis use and patient, surgical, and surgeon-related characteristics.

resultsA total of 474 consecutive patients were included, of whom 237 received perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and 237 did not. One postoperative surgical site infection occurred, corresponding to an overall infection rate of 0.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0-1.2). The infection occurred in a patient who did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis, was superficial, and resolved following treatment with oral antibiotics. No deep infections were observed. Substantial variation in prophylaxis use was observed among surgeons despite uniformly low infection rates across the cohort.

conclusionsPostoperative infection following volar locking plate fixation of closed distal radius fractures was rare in this contemporary cohort. The findings provide descriptive data on postoperative infection rates and perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis practice in routine clinical care. Although the study was not powered to evaluate the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis, the observed low infection burden may help inform future research on infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship in distal radius fracture surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisBone PlatesFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, ClosedRadius FracturesSurgical Wound InfectionWrist FracturesAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic prophylaxisDistal radius fractureFracture surgerySunfergical site ictionVolar locking plate

Identifiers

PMID42839261
PMCPMC13640282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.