Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42839213›Full record

ArticleNeurology and therapy2026

Real-world Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis in the United States.

Kavita Grover, Martin Cloutier, Geoffroy Coteur, Porpong Boonmak, Antoine C El Khoury, Maryia Zhdanava, Anabelle Tardif-Samson, Yuxi Wang, Kavita Gandhi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kavita GroverHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Martin CloutierAnalysis Group, Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada.
Geoffroy CoteurJohnson and Johnson, Horsham, PA, USA.
Porpong BoonmakAnalysis Group, Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada.
Antoine C El KhouryFormerly Johnson and Johnson, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Maryia ZhdanavaAnalysis Group, Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada.
Anabelle Tardif-SamsonAnalysis Group, Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada.
Yuxi WangAnalysis Group, Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada.
Kavita GandhiJohnson and Johnson, Raritan, NJ, USA. KGandhi9@ITS.JNJ.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4521-2467

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConventional treatments for generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) include acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEi), systemic corticosteroids, and non-steroidal immunosuppressants; standard of care for exacerbation or myasthenic crisis includes immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis; newer advanced treatments include B-cell depleting agents, complement-5 inhibitors (C5i), and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) blockers. This study described real-world treatment patterns with currently available therapies and prevalence of myasthenia gravis (MG)-related clinical events (exacerbations or crises) among patients with gMG in the US.

methodsAdults with gMG were identified from Komodo Research Data (January 1, 2017-February 28, 2025). Index date was the first MG diagnosis by a neurologist. Patients were followed for ≥ 12 months post-index. Treatment sequencing was characterized by individual classes and broader treatment types (conventional treatments, advanced immunotherapies, immunoglobulin). A treatment episode was defined based on treatment changes (discontinuation, switch, augmentation/add-on, or drop), with any remaining or newly initiated/added treatment marking a new episode. Prevalence of MG-related clinical events was also described.

resultsA total of 8759 patients were included (mean age: 61.5 years; 48.7% female; mean follow-up: 36.5 months). From the first (n = 7986) to fifth (n = 3340) treatment episode, AChEi use declined (80.3→57.6%), systemic corticosteroid use was consistent (49.0→63.0%), and use increased for non-steroidal immunosuppressants (12.7→40.2%), immunoglobulin (6.1→14.5%), rituximab (0.3→2.1%), C5i (0.3→3.4%), and FcRn blockers (0.3→3.8%). Conventional treatments were most frequently used in all episodes; advanced treatment use increased progressively from the first to fifth episodes, with initiation averaging 13.6-19.0 months post-diagnosis. Overall, 48.6% of patients experienced MG-related clinical events during follow-up, usually within the first year following gMG diagnosis (39.9%).

conclusionConventional treatments were the predominant initial strategy for gMG, while immunoglobulin and advanced treatments became more common over successive treatment episodes. The high prevalence of MG-related clinical events within the first year post-gMG diagnosis, despite treatment with conventional therapies, suggests the need for more effective and earlier interventions.

Indexed as

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitorCorticosteroidGeneralized myasthenia gravisImmunoglobulinImmunosuppressantNeonatal Fc receptorPlasmapheresisRituximab

Identifiers

PMID42839213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.