ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026
Automated pharmacophore hypothesis generator for SILCS-Pharm: ph4gen.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Here we present ph4gen, a tool for the automated generation of pharmacophore hypotheses developed for use with the site identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) technology. It builds upon the previously established SILCS-Pharm approach which generates the pharmacophore features from a given macromolecular structure, and SILCS-Hotspots which identifies potentially-druggable binding sites. The tool examines a set of pharmacophore features, typically 15-20, and ranks all permutations of hypotheses of a desired length, with default of 4 to 5 features per hypothesis. A diverse data set of seven proteins (namely, BACE1, CDK2, JNK1, P38, PTPT1B, Thrombin, and TYK2) and 336 ligands was used to train the logistic regression model which ranks these hypotheses and recalls at least one experimental pharmacophore hypothesis in four of seven cases in the top 10. The model was tested on a set of four separate proteins (namely FXR, HDM2, HSP90, and TRMD) and 354 ligands and recalls at least one experimental pharmacophore hypothesis in the top 5 in all four test systems, with mean precision and recall of 0.23 ± 0.06 and 0.15 ± 0.04, respectively. We show that the distribution of hypotheses generated is similar to that of the validated hypotheses, and that even in cases of near-misses, the pharmacophore hypotheses have similar chemical features to validated ones. The tool can also be tuned to provide greater or lesser chemical diversity when utilized in virtual screening. Ultimately, ph4gen is a useful tool as part of the SILCS workflow to identify druggable binding sites, generate drug-like pharmacophore hypotheses, and rank in silico hits for experimental validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42839203What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.