Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42839203›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026

Automated pharmacophore hypothesis generator for SILCS-Pharm: ph4gen.

Erik B Nordquist, Alexander D MacKerell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erik B NordquistDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9139-0152
Alexander D MacKerellDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. alex@outerbanks.umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8287-6804

Funding

Training Grant in Cancer BiologyT32CA154274 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Toni M Antalis, CURT I CIVIN · 2011 to 2026
$6.8M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA154274NIGMS NIH HHS GM131710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we present ph4gen, a tool for the automated generation of pharmacophore hypotheses developed for use with the site identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) technology. It builds upon the previously established SILCS-Pharm approach which generates the pharmacophore features from a given macromolecular structure, and SILCS-Hotspots which identifies potentially-druggable binding sites. The tool examines a set of pharmacophore features, typically 15-20, and ranks all permutations of hypotheses of a desired length, with default of 4 to 5 features per hypothesis. A diverse data set of seven proteins (namely, BACE1, CDK2, JNK1, P38, PTPT1B, Thrombin, and TYK2) and 336 ligands was used to train the logistic regression model which ranks these hypotheses and recalls at least one experimental pharmacophore hypothesis in four of seven cases in the top 10. The model was tested on a set of four separate proteins (namely FXR, HDM2, HSP90, and TRMD) and 354 ligands and recalls at least one experimental pharmacophore hypothesis in the top 5 in all four test systems, with mean precision and recall of 0.23 ± 0.06 and 0.15 ± 0.04, respectively. We show that the distribution of hypotheses generated is similar to that of the validated hypotheses, and that even in cases of near-misses, the pharmacophore hypotheses have similar chemical features to validated ones. The tool can also be tuned to provide greater or lesser chemical diversity when utilized in virtual screening. Ultimately, ph4gen is a useful tool as part of the SILCS workflow to identify druggable binding sites, generate drug-like pharmacophore hypotheses, and rank in silico hits for experimental validation.

Indexed as

ProteinsSoftwareAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAspartic Acid EndopeptidasesBinding SitesCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Drug DesignHumansLigandsModels, MolecularPharmacophoreProtein BindingAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAspartic Acid EndopeptidasesBACE1 protein, humanCDK2 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2LigandsProteinsDrug designHit identificationMachine learningPharmacophoreVirtual screening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.