Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42839170›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

A global sagittal deviation index (GSDI-5) incorporating upper cervical alignment: initial construct validation in forward head posture.

Katterine N Ríos-Peralta, Kathleen M Curran, David B MacManus, Lukas Schönnagel, Matthias Pumberger, Hendrik Schmidt, Ali Firouzabadi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katterine N Ríos-PeraltaSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. katterine.rios@ucdconnect.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9244-5490
Kathleen M CurranSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
David B MacManusSchool of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2959-698X
Lukas SchönnagelJulius Wolf Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0743-8860
Matthias PumbergerCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hendrik SchmidtJulius Wolf Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3300-8685
Ali FirouzabadiJulius Wolf Institute, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. ali.firouzabadi@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4335-1698

Funding

DAAD; German Academic Exchange Service 57742125German Research Foundation, FOR5177 DFG, SCHM 2572/12-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeForward head posture (FHP) is commonly assessed using isolated cervical measures, potentially overlooking its relationship with global sagittal alignment. This study introduces the Global Sagittal Deviation Index (GSDI-5), a composite measure integrating multiregional sagittal alignment with explicit inclusion of the upper cervical spine.

methodsStanding lateral EOS radiographs from 201 adults referred for evaluation of low back pain were analysed and classified into FHP and non-FHP groups. Standardized sagittal parameters across the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and global spine were combined into a single score. Initial construct validity was examined through known-groups comparisons and convergent analyses with TPA and PI-LL.

resultsIndividuals with FHP demonstrated higher GSDI-5 scores. GSDI-5 showed a large effect size for differentiating FHP from non-FHP (Hedges' g = 0.85), slightly exceeding that of TPA (g = 0.81) and PI-LL (g = 0.32), with increasing severity associated with progressive changes in global alignment measures.

conclusionBy integrating upper cervical alignment into a whole-spine framework, GSDI-5 summarizes cranio-cervical behaviour relevant to FHP and may serve as a complementary exploratory measure for global sagittal deviation in radiographic and postural assessment, alongside existing sagittal alignment metrics.

Indexed as

Composite indexForward head postureGlobal sagittal alignmentLow Back PainRadiographic analysisSagittal balanceUpper cervical spine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.