ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Financial Toxicity in Patients with Resected Esophageal Cancer.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEsophagectomy for esophageal cancer is associated with significant morbidity and can result in financial hardship, yet this aspect of survivorship remains understudied. This study evaluated the prevalence and risk factors of financial toxicity (FT) among patients following esophagectomy.
methodsPatients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2016 and September 2022 were surveyed about demographic, financial, and employment history. Financial toxicity was measured by using the validated COST survey. Multivariate analyses identified predictors of FT.
resultsOf 370 patients contacted, 159 (43%) completed the survey. Median age was 65.3 years; 82.4% were male. Following therapy, 44.7% reported decreased work hours or stopped working entirely. Insurance was employer-based for 50.3%, while 40.6% had Medicare. Financial toxicity was reported by 37.1%. Risk factors included larger household size (odds ratio 2.3), low credit score (odds ratio 13.2), while high income and active retirement were protective.
conclusionsMore than a third of esophagectomy patients were found to have FT. Those with poor baseline financial health or disrupted employment were most vulnerable and may benefit from early financial counseling and support interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42839159What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.