Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42839119›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026

Are QM/MM models systematically improvable? A case study on carbonic anhydrase binding affinities.

Haedam Mun, Junming Ho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haedam MunSchool of Chemistry, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Junming HoSchool of Chemistry, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. junming.ho@unsw.edu.au.

Funding

Australian Research Council FT240100584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybrid quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) is the method of choice for modelling large biochemical systems, but their performance depends critically on how they are implemented. This paper examines the sensitivity of QM/MM enzyme-ligand binding energy predictions to key parameters, including QM region size, the incorporation of thermal and solvation effects as well the use of docked poses versus crystal structures. The focus is on carbonic anhydrase which has emerged as an important drug target for a wide variety of pathologies. It is demonstrated that trends in binding affinities are surprisingly insensitive with respect to these parameters. QM/MM geometry optimization of poses obtained from molecular docking enhances predictive utility for yet-to-be synthesized ligands, though outliers arise from structural deviations or non-native interactions. These findings provide practical guidelines for QM/MM applications in carbonic anhydrase and similar metalloenzymes.

Indexed as

Carbonic Anhydrase InhibitorsCarbonic AnhydrasesBinding SitesHumansLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingQuantum MechanicsQuantum TheoryThermodynamicsCarbonic Anhydrase InhibitorsCarbonic AnhydrasesLigandsBinding free energyCarbonic anhydraseCluster modelsMolecular dockingQM/MMSolvent effects

Identifiers

PMID42839119
PMCPMC13642402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.