ArticleNature medicine2026
An open vision-language model for diverse medical applications.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
88 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence has high potential for impact in healthcare applications, but its training and deployment are challenging due to diverse data, a complex spectrum of possible tasks and important privacy needs. High-performing foundation models that enable data-efficient fine-tuning for diverse downstream tasks can meaningfully accelerate development in this domain. We introduce MedGemma, a collection of medical vision-language foundation models based on Gemma 3. MedGemma demonstrates advanced medical understanding and reasoning across images and text and multiple medical imaging domains, exceeding the performance of similarly sized generative models while maintaining the general capabilities of the Gemma base models. For out-of-distribution tasks, MedGemma achieves improvements of 2.6-10% in medical image question answering, 15.5-18.1% in chest X-ray finding classification and 10.8% in agentic evaluations compared with the base models. Our results show that fine-tuning MedGemma can be more effective than fine-tuning the base Gemma 3 model for medical tasks, particularly in the setting of limited training data. We additionally introduce MedSigLIP, a medically tuned vision encoder derived from SigLIP. MedSigLIP powers the visual understanding capabilities of MedGemma and, as an encoder, achieves performance comparable to or better than that of many specialized medical image encoders. Taken together, the MedGemma collection provides a strong foundation of medical image and text capabilities, with the potential to accelerate medical research and the development of downstream applications.
Identifiers
42839104What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.