ReviewVeterinary research communications2026
From traditional histopathology to virtual staining: deep learning approaches for assessing tissue lesions in farmed fish.
Review in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pesticides in aquaculture water and feed primarily induce chronic, sublethal toxicity rather than acute mortality, impairing growth, immune function, and tissue integrity. Consequently, organ-specific histopathological biomarkers are essential for ecotoxicological assessment and welfare monitoring. Traditional histopathology directly evaluates structural damage in key organs (e.g., gills, liver, kidneys). However, manual workflows face major bottlenecks, including invasive sampling, labor-intensive preparation, and observer-dependent scoring that hinder high-throughput screening and regulatory harmonization. This review evaluates how digital pathology integrating Whole Slide Imaging (WSI), deep learning for automated lesion quantification, and generative AI-based virtual staining bridges these analytical gaps. We examine how digitalization enhances diagnostic objectivity and scalability while reducing scoring variability. Furthermore, we critically address key implementation challenges, including ground-truth requirements, domain shifts across staining protocols, species generalization, and dataset annotation burdens. Ultimately, AI-enabled digital pathology represents a credible pathway toward objective, high-throughput pesticide toxicity assessment in aquaculture. However, standardized validation frameworks and robust ground-truth datasets remain critical prerequisites before these tools can transition from experimental promise to regulatory acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42839101What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.