Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42839098›Full record

ReviewProtoplasma2026

Methylated memories mechanism, evidence, and skepticism in plant transgenerational epigenetic inheritance.

Gurjant Singh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Protoplasma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gurjant SinghDepartment of Biology, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ, USA. gurjantaulakh008@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants are repeatedly offered as the strongest case that organisms can inherit acquired experience without a change in DNA sequence - a claim that brushes against more than a century of Weismannian orthodoxy. DNA methylation, small-RNA pathways, and chromatin marks can be reshaped by heat, drought, salinity, and pathogen attack, and in several plant systems these marks persist into unstressed offspring. Yet the field remains split. Well-controlled studies find epigenetic memory to be shallow, genotype-dependent, and easily confused with parental provisioning or incomplete resetting during gametogenesis, while a smaller set of striking systems - among them paramutation at the maize b1 locus and stress-induced methylation in clonal dandelions - show that heritable, sequence-independent memory is mechanistically real, at least in specific genomic contexts. This review focuses on DNA methylation, the best-characterized carrier of heritable epigenetic information in plants, and in particular on RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM), the de novo pathway most closely linked to stress, while placing it alongside the MET1 and chromomethylase pathways and chromatin-based memory. It uses maize paramutation and dandelion stress memory as two contrasting, illustrative case studies, situates them within the wider body of stress-methylation experiments in Arabidopsis, rice, and other species, lays out the skeptical counter-case, and considers why commercial interest in "climate-smart" epigenetically primed seed is forcing the field to resolve these questions faster than the data currently allow.

Indexed as

DNA methylationParamutationRNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM)Stress memoryTaraxacum officinaleTransgenerational epigenetic inheritance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.