ReviewLeukemia2026
Chronic myeloid leukemia in a global context: confirmatory findings and novel discoveries from a refined Japanese Cohort.
Review in Leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment-free remission (TFR) has become a major therapeutic goal in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Japanese clinical and translational studies have contributed substantially to this field. Here, we review Japanese studies and distinguish between findings that corroborate internationally established concepts and those that provide novel biological insights. Confirmatory studies demonstrated the feasibility of TFR after sustained deep molecular response (DMR), established DMR duration as a more important determinant of durable remission than rapid attainment, and confirmed the feasibility of repeated discontinuation attempts. Together, these findings support the concept that sustained DMR provides sufficient time for both continued reduction of residual disease burden and progressive restoration of immune surveillance. Beyond these observations, Japanese studies have provided important mechanistic insights into leukemic stem cell persistence, dasatinib-associated immune remodeling, inherited immunogenetic determinants of TFR, adaptive immune surveillance, and practical biomarkers of TFR eligibility. Collectively, these findings support an integrated model of TFR in which inherited immunogenetic background, immune competence, leukemic stem cell persistence, and treatment history interact dynamically to determine clinical outcomes. Ongoing studies, including ASSET-CML and ASC4Edit Japan, may further translate these insights into more individualized and durable TFR strategies.
Identifiers
42839072What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.