ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Optimising ovarian cancer care: An embedded mixed methods evaluation of a national nurse-led telehealth program.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA nationwide nurse-led telehealth case management program was established providing personalised supportive care to individuals and families experiencing ovarian cancer. The program was evaluated using the RE-AIM framework. This paper focuses on the effectiveness findings of the evaluation.
methodsUsing mixed methods design, participants completed four surveys over 12 months assessing symptom burden, psychological distress, supportive care needs, quality of life, and self-efficacy. Service experiences were further explored through interviews.
resultsOf the 652 individuals enrolled in the program, 112 (17%) participated in the evaluation. Predominant baseline moderate to severe symptoms were fatigue (65%); anxiety (56%); and sleep issues (50%). Key unmet needs included: uncertainty about the future (54%); fear of cancer spread (48%); and anxiety (42%). 43% reported high distress; 27% lacked confidence self-managing fatigue, 23% self-managing distress. All participants received symptom and needs assessment; 80% received information support, and one-third accessed specialised psychosocial care. Those with greater symptom burden, distress, lower quality of life and self-efficacy at baseline received more services. Over 12 months, overall wellbeing and satisfaction with information improved significantly. 30 interview participants consistently valued the program for: being seen and heard as a whole person; trusted information and advice; meaningful emotional support; and flexible and timely services.
conclusionParticipation in this nurse-led telehealth program was associated with improved outcomes and positive experiences among individuals with ovarian cancer who are at high risk of poorer outcomes. These findings support continued investment in person-centred tailored supportive care delivered via telehealth prioritising emotional wellbeing, symptom management, and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.