Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42839040›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2026

Biodiversity safeguards ecosystem services and functions worldwide.

Emma R Moffett, Joel H Gayford, Lexi Chen, Olivia F Morris, Yuming Shi, Lucy Somekh, Nicole Stasik, Andy Purvis, Guy Woodward, William D Pearse

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emma R MoffettThe Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Berkshire, UK. emma.moffett@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9891-6217
Joel H GayfordThe Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Berkshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0839-3940
Lexi ChenThe Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Berkshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7196-646X
Olivia F MorrisThe Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Berkshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3093-419X
Yuming ShiThe Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Berkshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4027-2373
Lucy SomekhThe Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Berkshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6317-7076
Nicole StasikThe Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Berkshire, UK.
Andy PurvisThe Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Berkshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8609-6204
Guy WoodwardThe Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Berkshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6158-2559
William D PearseThe Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Berkshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6241-3164

Funding

Alan Turing Institute FA.04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity loss threatens ecosystem services on which humanity depends, yet the strength, form and context-dependency of biodiversity-ecosystem service and biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships remain poorly quantified. Here we synthesize 423 studies to determine how biodiversity affects ecosystem functioning and service delivery. We show that regulating services, including water quality and pollination, often exhibit linear relationships, suggesting an additive role for diversity. While biodiversity enhances most functions and services, our effect-size analysis shows that oceanic 'blue carbon' sequestration is exceptionally sensitive, revealing how critical marine biodiversity is for climate mitigation. Conversely, services such as hazard regulation appear relatively insensitive to biodiversity, instead depending on a few functionally unique foundational species whose persistence nonetheless is interdependent on the wider community. Our new synthesis enables the forecasting of impacts, for example, that biodiversity loss will reduce pest regulation in countries experiencing population growth and intensive development, and it also highlights how ecosystem services might be used to anticipate future problems.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.