ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
BEAM versus EAM, FEAM, BeEAM, and TEAM: exploring conditioning strategies in autologous stem cell transplantation for Hodgkin lymphoma a retrospective study of the LWP of EBMT.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) remains the most used chemotherapy for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in chemosensitive relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). Nevertheless, alternatives have been developed to overcome drugs availability, costs, or potential toxicities. These include BeEAM (substitute carmustine with bendamustine), FEAM (using fotemustine instead of carmustine), TEAM (incorporating thiotepa instead of carmustine) and EAM (without bendamustine, fotemustine, thiotepa or carmustine). We analysed 13207 adults with HL who underwent HSCT in EBMT centers from 2010 to 2022. Chemotherapy was BEAM in 77% (n = 10167), FEAM in 13% (n = 1702), BeEAM in 6% (n = 729), TEAM in 3% (n = 365), and EAM in 2% (n = 244). In multivariable analysis, BeEAM was associated with decreased overall survival (OS) (HR 1.61, p = 0.003) and progression free survival (PFS) (HR 1.48, p < 0.001), higher relapse incidence (RI) (HR 1.43, p < 0.001) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR 1.85, p = 0.04). EAM regimen was also associated with decreased OS (HR 1.55, p = 0.019). Propensity score matching was performed as a sensitivity analysis and confirmed the results of the multivariable analysis. We observed poorer outcomes in patients who received bendamustine in our cohort.
Identifiers
42839027What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.