Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42839023›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026

Healthcare professionals' views on expanding newborn screening with or without genomics in France: Results of the SeDeN-p2 study.

Camille Level, Frédéric Huet, Dominique Salvi, Christel Thauvin Robinet, Emmanuel Simon, Margot Lemaitre, Christine Peyron, Laurence Faivre

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Camille LevelUniversité Bourgogne Europe, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, FHU-TRANSLAD, Centre de recherche Translationnelle en Médecine moléculaire - Inserm UMR1231 équipe GAD, Dijon, France. camille.level@chu-dijon.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0185-8207
Frédéric HuetUniversité Bourgogne Europe, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Service de Pédiatrie, FHU-TRANSLAD, Centre de recherche Translationnelle en Médecine moléculaire - Inserm UMR1231 équipe GAD, Dijon, France.
Dominique SalviUniversité Bourgogne Europe, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, FHU-TRANSLAD, Centre de recherche Translationnelle en Médecine moléculaire - Inserm UMR1231 équipe GAD, Dijon, France.
Christel Thauvin RobinetUniversité Bourgogne Europe, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Laboratoire de Génomique Médicale, FHU-TRANSLAD, Centre de recherche Translationnelle en Médecine moléculaire - Inserm UMR1231 équipe GAD, Dijon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4155-139X
Emmanuel SimonUniversité Bourgogne Europe, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Maternité, Dijon, France.
Margot LemaitreUniversité Bourgogne Europe, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, FHU-TRANSLAD, Centre de recherche Translationnelle en Médecine moléculaire - Inserm UMR1231 équipe GAD, Dijon, France.
Christine PeyronUniversité Bourgogne Europe, Laboratoire LeDi, FHU-TRANSLAD, Dijon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3823-0859
Laurence FaivreUniversité Bourgogne Europe, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Centre de Génétique et Centre de Référence Anomalies du Développement et Syndromes Malformatifs, FHU-TRANSLAD, Centre de recherche Translationnelle en Médecine moléculaire - Inserm UMR1231 équipe GAD, Dijon, France. laurence.faivre@chu-dijon.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9770-444X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic advances and the rapid, cost-effective development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) have increased interest in expanding newborn screening (NBS) through genomics. The SeDeN-p2 study assessed the acceptability among healthcare professionals in France, of expanding NBS, particularly with genetics as a first-line test, by examining areas of convergence and divergence in their expectations. A national cross-sectional survey was conducted between June and December 2021 via professional networks and learned societies involved in NBS and genetics, in partnership with the French Society of Newborn Screening. The questionnaire comprised 101 closed-ended and 14 open-ended questions. After data cleaning, 1077 responses were analysed. Respondents were mainly paediatricians (43%), gynaecologists or midwives (36%), and medical geneticists or genetic counsellors (17%). Support for the inclusion of treatable childhood-onset conditions was very high, with over 95% endorsing their integration into NBS, although 29% still considered the current NBS programme sufficient. Views varied substantially by specialty, particularly regarding the scope of conditions and the use of NGS. Genetics professionals were more conservative, especially concerning variants with limited actionability, organisational constraints, and interpretive uncertainty, while midwives and gynaecologists were generally more favourable. Convergence was strongest for treatable paediatric conditions and shared ethical concerns, notably data misuse, psychosocial burden, and the child's future autonomy. The need for improved communication with families was widely emphasised. The SeDeN-p2 study shows strong but conditional support among French healthcare professionals for integrating genetics into NBS, providing key insights to inform future policy and practice.

Identifiers

PMID42839023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.