Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42838958›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Thermal conductivity predictions with foundation atomistic models.

Balázs Póta, Paramvir Ahlawat, Gábor Csányi, Michele Simoncelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Balázs PótaTheory of Condensed Matter Group of the Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3530-6686
Paramvir AhlawatTheory of Condensed Matter Group of the Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2355-3663
Gábor CsányiEngineering Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8180-2034
Michele SimoncelliTheory of Condensed Matter Group of the Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. michele.simoncelli@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7052-4286

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation | National Center of Competence in Research Affective Sciences - Emotions in Individual Behaviour and Social Processes (National Centre of Competence in Research Affective Sciences) P500PN_206693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in machine learning have led to the development of foundation models for atomistic materials chemistry, enabling quantum-accurate descriptions of interatomic forces across chemically diverse compounds at reduced computational cost. Hitherto, the accuracy and utility of these models have been assessed relying on descriptors based on formation energies or idealized harmonic atomic vibrations. Yet, the rigorous and physically interpretable quantification of their capability to describe both realistic anharmonic atomic dynamics and technologically relevant observables remains a pressing problem. Here, we address this problem, leveraging the Wigner formulation of heat transport and the Grüneisen approach to thermal expansion to connect the atomic-physics awareness of foundation models to their utility in predicting experimentally observable thermomechanical properties, presenting standards and fine-tuning protocols needed to achieve first-principles accuracy. We apply our framework to a database of 103 solids with diverse compositions and structures, demonstrating that it overcomes the major bottlenecks of current methods for designing heat-management materials - high cost, limited transferability, or lack of physics awareness - and has the potential to discover materials for technologies ranging from thermal insulation to neuromorphic computing.

Identifiers

PMID42838958
PMCPMC13642343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.