ArticleNature communications2026
Phenological fluctuations induce seasonal asymmetric warming in boreal forests.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phenological shifts in boreal forests alter land-atmosphere energy exchange, but annual averages mask pronounced seasonal contrasts in the magnitude and pathways of this feedback. Here we show that climate-driven phenological instability generates a systematic warming asymmetry: surface warming from leaf area loss exceeds the cooling from an equivalent gain. During the growing season, additional foliage yields diminishing cooling returns as transpiration approaches its physiological limits, constraining latent heat flux. During the dormant season, the canopy-snow albedo contrast makes shortwave radiation dominant; because this radiative perturbation is converted into surface temperature highly non-linearly, foliage loss still produces a net warming exceeding the cooling from an equivalent gain. Per unit leaf area change, the median asymmetry index indicates warming roughly 2.0-2.3 times stronger than cooling in spring and autumn, and about an order of magnitude stronger in winter, where a very small greening-side sensitivity inflates the ratio; in summer both responses approach the detection limit and the asymmetry is not directionally robust. Phenological instability therefore acts as a seasonally structured positive biophysical feedback in northern ecosystems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.