Trial reportNature communications2026
Neoadjuvant PD1 plus CTLA-4 immune checkpoint blockade in surgically resectable recurrent glioblastoma: a randomized surgical window-of-opportunity trial.
Trial report in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04606316 (A Phase Ib Clinical Trial to Evaluate Early Immunologic Pharmacodynamic Parameters Following Neoadjuvant Anti-PD-1), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase Ib Clinical Trial to Evaluate Early Immunologic Pharmacodynamic Parameters Following Neoadjuvant Anti-PD-1 (Nivolumab), or the Combination of Anti-PD-1 Plus Anti-CTLA-4 (Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab) in Patients With Surgically Accessible Glioblastoma
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We conducted a randomized surgical window-of-opportunity trial ( NCT04606316 ) in recurrent, resectable glioblastoma. Between 2021 and 2024, 71 patients were screened, and 63 were randomized (intention-to-treat [ITT] population), and 58 received study treatment. Patients received pre-surgical immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with dual anti-PD1 nivolumab + anti-CTLA4 ipilimumab (Arm 1), nivolumab alone (Arm 2), or placebo (Arm 3). Following surgery, Arms 1 and 3 received dual ICB, while Arm 2 continued nivolumab until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density, was met for Arm 1, as neoadjuvant dual ICB significantly increased TIL density compared with untreated control (Arm 3). As a secondary endpoint, median overall survival in the ITT population was 402 days (95% CI, 265-571) among patients who received dual ICB (Arms 1 and 3) and 273 days (95% CI, 166-506) for those assigned to nivolumab alone (Arm 2). No unanticipated toxicities were observed. Exploratory analyses showed that dual ICB elicited robust intratumoral and systemic immune activation, including increased interferon-related gene expression in blood. Higher TIL density and early systemic interferon-signature induction were associated with improved survival, whereas tumor mutational burden was not. Our results demonstrate pharmacodynamic activity of dual ICB in glioblastoma, with survival outcomes comparing favorably to similar studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.