ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2026
A Direct DNA Extraction Workflow for Metabarcoding Fungal Bioaerosols From Adhesive Samplers.
Article in Environmental microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring fungal bioaerosols is essential for understanding their impacts on human health and crop productivity. However, current monitoring approaches rely on culture-dependent techniques, which underestimate the diversity of fungal exposures. Adhesive-coated films can effectively capture airborne particles but have been regarded as unsuitable for downstream DNA analysis, owing to the lack of standardised DNA extraction methods for the adhesive capture surface. Here, we present an optimised DNA extraction protocol for adhesive film, which we developed and validated to enable direct and culture-independent ITS2-based metabarcoding of fungal bioaerosols collected on a 96-well plate sealing film ('Sticky sampler'). This validated approach was applied to field samples collected from four agricultural farms and from a domestic garden to evaluate seasonal and spatial changes in fungal bioaerosols. Our analysis uncovered pronounced site-specific contrasts linked to geography and land management, as well as clear seasonal shifts in garden fungal communities. This study demonstrates that adhesive samplers, combined with optimised DNA extraction, provide a practical and inexpensive tool for fungal bioaerosol research by resolving ecologically meaningful spatiotemporal dynamics of airborne fungi. This protocol opens new opportunities for highly scalable surveillance of environmental bioaerosols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.