Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42838712›Full record

Trial reportBMJ mental health2026

Randomised controlled trial of fluoxetine versus naltrexone in compulsive sexual behaviour disorder.

Josephine Savard, Marta Piwowar, Roberth Adebahr, Markus Byström, Jonas Hallberg, Cecilia Dhejne, Katarina Görts Öberg, Jussi Jokinen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Josephine SavardDepartment of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden josephine.savard@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0140-4109
Marta PiwowarDepartment of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6361-7862
Roberth AdebahrDepartment of Clinical Sciences (Psychiatry), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Markus ByströmANOVA, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6296-8119
Jonas HallbergDepartment of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cecilia DhejneDepartment of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Katarina Görts ÖbergDepartment of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jussi JokinenDepartment of Clinical Sciences (Psychiatry), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompulsive sexual behaviour disorder (CSBD), characterised by preoccupation with and loss of control over sexual behaviours, is associated with negative consequences in several areas of life. Evidence for pharmacological treatment remains limited, with only two previous randomised controlled trials and no studies comparing fluoxetine and naltrexone.

objectiveTo investigate whether naltrexone was more efficient and tolerable than fluoxetine in the treatment of CSBD.

methodsIn this open-label superiority trial, 80 participants diagnosed with CSBD according to International Classification of Diseases-11 criteria were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive fluoxetine (starting dose 20 mg/day) or naltrexone (starting dose 25 mg/day) for 8 weeks followed by 6 weeks without treatment. Symptom severity was recurringly assessed using the Hypersexual Disorder: Current Assessment Scale (HD:CAS). Linear mixed models were used for intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses of treatment effects.

findings79 men and 1 woman were randomised to receive fluoxetine (n=40) or naltrexone (n=40). Analysis showed no statistically significant difference in HD:CAS score reduction between treatments at primary endpoint; naltrexone was not superior to fluoxetine. However, participants in the two treatment groups showed different patterns of symptom improvement over time.Two participants (5.1%) receiving fluoxetine were withdrawn due to adverse events (urticaria and elevated liver enzymes) and four participants (10.3%) discontinued treatment; six participants (15%) receiving naltrexone discontinued treatment.

conclusionsAlthough no statistically significant between-group difference was observed at week 8, symptom trajectories and adverse effect profiles differed between groups. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Symptom-change patterns and adverse effect profiles may guide individualised treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Compulsive Sexual Behavior DisorderFluoxetineNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAdultFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeFluoxetineNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsPsychiatryPsychopharmacology

Identifiers

PMID42838712
PMCPMC13646924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.