Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42838618›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open ophthalmology2026

Compliance with post-school vision screening referral: a systematic review.

Jinli Cui, Shuxi Zhuo, Yimin Qin, Jiayi Wang, Ruoyang Chen, Wenyong Huang, Lingyi Liang, Xiaotong Han

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jinli Cui *Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Major Blinding Eye Diseases Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou, China.
Shuxi Zhuo *Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Major Blinding Eye Diseases Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou, China.
Yimin QinZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Major Blinding Eye Diseases Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou, China.
Jiayi WangZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Major Blinding Eye Diseases Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou, China.
Ruoyang ChenZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Major Blinding Eye Diseases Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou, China.
Wenyong HuangZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Major Blinding Eye Diseases Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou, China hanxiaotong2@gzzoc.com lianglingyi@gzzoc.com huangwenyong@gzzoc.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3167-0851
Lingyi LiangZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Major Blinding Eye Diseases Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou, China hanxiaotong2@gzzoc.com lianglingyi@gzzoc.com huangwenyong@gzzoc.com.
Xiaotong HanZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, WHO Collaborating Centre for Eye Care and Vision, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Major Blinding Eye Diseases Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou, China hanxiaotong2@gzzoc.com lianglingyi@gzzoc.com huangwenyong@gzzoc.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6836-3447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo estimate referral compliance rates and evaluate intervention effectiveness after post-school vision screening in children and adolescents.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library for studies published from January 2015 to December 2025. Eligible studies reported referral compliance data for school-aged populations. Study quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool. Due to significant heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was conducted. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251268955).

resultsA total of 30 articles were included. Real-world referral compliance rates were suboptimal, with a median of 43.1% (range: 12.0-79.7%). Analysis of 14 intervention studies revealed three main strategies for improving compliance: the on-site care model which provided prescriptions for eyeglasses at school, the referral pathway model which provided clear instructions regarding the pathway to follow-up care, and the education model which provided health education and referral encouragement primarily. On-site care achieved relatively higher compliance rates (51.8-96.0%), whereas providing a clear referral pathway also benefited referral compliance (25.0-65.7%). However, the education model alone is insufficient to significantly improve compliance (21.3-24.5%).

conclusionsReferral compliance is suboptimal and variable. It is crucial for settings to provide on-site care whenever feasible. Alternatively, establishing clear referral pathways is essential to ensure that children receive the appropriate eye care they need.

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceReferral and ConsultationSchoolsVision ScreeningAdolescentChildHumansChild HealthEpidemiologyPublic healthVision

Identifiers

PMID42838618
PMCPMC13647025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.