ArticleBMJ open2026
'It's everybody's business': a multi-method study to co-develop and evaluate a web-based interprofessional Sexual Function Intimacy Concerns after Cancer educational programme (SexFICC) to upskill cancer healthcare providers.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWith improved survival rates, there is a growing population of cancer survivors who experience sexual health concerns following cancer treatment. These are widely recognised sequelae of cancer and cancer treatment, negatively impacting intimate relationships and quality of life. At least 40% (up to 100%) of people affected by cancer report concerns in this area. However, despite being well documented long-term challenges, they remain largely unaddressed by healthcare teams leading to further deterioration in sexual health. Healthcare providers identify this as an important quality of life issue; however, this does not translate into action. Barriers identified by healthcare providers include lack of knowledge, comfort and confidence, misconception of limited interventions and referral pathways available, and considerations regarding how to raise and discuss this topic. Coordinated systematic approaches for assessment and management of SFI concerns are lacking. The SexFICC Programme will address these gaps. SexFICC is an educational programme designed to improve sexual health outcomes in people affected by cancer by upskilling the cancer workforce in detecting and managing these issues throughout the cancer experience. No such training currently exists in the Australian context. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multi-phase mixed-methods design will be employed. Through co-design with key stakeholders (anticipated n=40), we will co-develop, user test (n=10 participants), evaluate (minimum n=50) and disseminate a clinically integrated education programme aimed at increasing knowledge, confidence and skills in addressing sexual health concerns with anticipated positive changes on practice. The programme will include an educational course and practical evidence-based resources for cancer healthcare providers and approaches to address sexual health unmet needs in all people affected by cancer, with a unique focus on identified priority populations. This programme is informed by overwhelming evidence demonstrating major gaps in health services designed for detecting and managing sexual health-related issues; priorities for people affected by cancer, healthcare providers and policy makers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Sydney Human Ethics Committee (Study Protocol #2025/HE001690). Results will be published in appropriate peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences, disseminated to participants in the form of a plain language summary and widely disseminated to consumer and professional stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.