Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42838590›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

'It's everybody's business': a multi-method study to co-develop and evaluate a web-based interprofessional Sexual Function Intimacy Concerns after Cancer educational programme (SexFICC) to upskill cancer healthcare providers.

Claudia Rutherford, Mary Hayes, Sharon De Graves, Jacqueline G Bloomfield, Horas Wong, Linda Taoube, Shannon Philp, Tamara Power, Kathe Holmes, Kyleigh Smith and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Claudia RutherfordSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Care Research Unit, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia claudia.rutherford@sydney.edu.au.
Mary HayesSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Care Research Unit, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sharon De GravesDepartment of Nursing, The University of Melbourne Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jacqueline G BloomfieldSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Care Research Unit, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Horas WongSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Linda TaoubeSydney Medical Program, General Practice Clinical School, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Shannon PhilpSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Care Research Unit, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Tamara PowerSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3334-0322
Kathe HolmesUniversity of Melbourne Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Kyleigh SmithUniversity of Melbourne Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Michelle BarrettUniversity of Melbourne Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Donna CowanMovember Institute of Men's Health, Movember Foundation, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sarah WellerMovember Institute of Men's Health, Movember Foundation, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kate WhiteSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Care Research Unit, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4763-1734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith improved survival rates, there is a growing population of cancer survivors who experience sexual health concerns following cancer treatment. These are widely recognised sequelae of cancer and cancer treatment, negatively impacting intimate relationships and quality of life. At least 40% (up to 100%) of people affected by cancer report concerns in this area. However, despite being well documented long-term challenges, they remain largely unaddressed by healthcare teams leading to further deterioration in sexual health. Healthcare providers identify this as an important quality of life issue; however, this does not translate into action. Barriers identified by healthcare providers include lack of knowledge, comfort and confidence, misconception of limited interventions and referral pathways available, and considerations regarding how to raise and discuss this topic. Coordinated systematic approaches for assessment and management of SFI concerns are lacking. The SexFICC Programme will address these gaps. SexFICC is an educational programme designed to improve sexual health outcomes in people affected by cancer by upskilling the cancer workforce in detecting and managing these issues throughout the cancer experience. No such training currently exists in the Australian context. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multi-phase mixed-methods design will be employed. Through co-design with key stakeholders (anticipated n=40), we will co-develop, user test (n=10 participants), evaluate (minimum n=50) and disseminate a clinically integrated education programme aimed at increasing knowledge, confidence and skills in addressing sexual health concerns with anticipated positive changes on practice. The programme will include an educational course and practical evidence-based resources for cancer healthcare providers and approaches to address sexual health unmet needs in all people affected by cancer, with a unique focus on identified priority populations. This programme is informed by overwhelming evidence demonstrating major gaps in health services designed for detecting and managing sexual health-related issues; priorities for people affected by cancer, healthcare providers and policy makers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Sydney Human Ethics Committee (Study Protocol #2025/HE001690). Results will be published in appropriate peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences, disseminated to participants in the form of a plain language summary and widely disseminated to consumer and professional stakeholders.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsHealth PersonnelNeoplasmsSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSexual HealthAustraliaFemaleHumansInternetMaleProgram EvaluationQuality of LifeSexual BehaviorCancerCancer SurvivorsHealth ServicesMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAININGNursing Care

Identifiers

PMID42838590
PMCPMC13647004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.