ArticleBMJ open2026
Patients' experiences of and adherence to supervised high-intensity physical training integrated into specialised treatment for substance use disorders:
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPersons with substance use disorders (SUDs) have markedly increased risk for lifestyle-related diseases and reduced life expectancy. Initial findings suggest that high-intensity physical training (HIT) represents an efficient and effective training modality for improving physical and functional capacity for persons with SUDs. However, acheiving such improvements depends not only on the availability of such training modalities but also on adherence, which remains insufficiently understood in this population. Thus, to extend the benefits of HIT to additional persons within this population, there is a need for a broader, deeper, and more patient-centred understanding of their experiences with HIT integrated into specialised treatment, including facilitators and barriers to adherence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol article presents an ongoing qualitative collaborative health service study where inpatients with SUDs are interviewed in-depth about their experiences of and adherence to HIT by semi-structured interview guides. Approximately 20 inpatients with SUDs will be purposively recruited based on relevant background variables and inclusion criteria to ensure breadth in experiences: 10 who have adhered to supervised HIT as part of specialised SUD treatment and 10 who have not. Depth will be supported through in-depth interviewing, reflexive field notes, and collaborative thematic analysis with persons with lived experiences. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval from Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (Reference ID: 2019/501). By strengthening the knowledge base on factors influencing adherence and non-adherence in HIT as part of clinical practice, the findings may support patient's adherence to HIT integrated in SUD treatment in a more person-centred way, ultimately benefiting the physical and functional capacity for additional persons with SUDs. Findings will be disseminated together with persons with lived experiences via conferences, peer-reviewed publications, as well as popular-scientific communication and media. Finally, the findings may generate theoretically informative insights into patients' experiences and mechanisms influencing adherence to HIT, as well as novel concepts and insights needed for new research directions within an increasingly prioritised field in specialised SUD treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.