ArticleBMJ open2026
Healthcare professionals' experiences of providing care for patients with Graves' disease: a qualitative interview study in Swedish secondary care.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGraves' disease (GD) is an autoimmune thyroid disease, mainly affecting women of working age. The hyperthyroidism in GD is characterised by physical symptoms (tachycardia, weight loss, sweating and tremors) as well as cognitive and psychological problems that have a major impact on the daily lives of patients. Mental symptoms are particularly distressing, with patients expressing a desire for more communication and support for the mental aspects of their care. The aim of this study was to explore the experience of healthcare professionals (HCPs) when providing care and treatment to patients with GD.
designA qualitative study based on interviews conducted digitally or face to face was performed with data evaluated according to Graneheim and Lundman's qualitative content analysis.
settingThe study was conducted within specialised care at the secondary level in a Swedish healthcare context.
participants12 HCPs (6 physicians and 6 registered nurses) with experience in providing care and treatment for patients with GD were interviewed.
resultsThe study highlighted shortcomings in the care of patients with GD, emphasising that GD is more complex than many other endocrine conditions due to its cognitive and psychological impact. Several obstacles hindered the ability to meet patient needs, including limited time, an organisational structure that is not adapted to the nature of GD, insufficient resources and a lack of interdisciplinary cooperation. HCPs acknowledged that patients often had needs that exceeded what the current system allowed them to address, which led to frustration and affected the work environment. There was a strong and shared desire among HCPs for changes that could improve the quality of care for this patient group.
conclusionOptimal care for patients with GD requires treatment tailored to the specific needs of each patient supported by organisational approaches that acknowledge the complexity of the condition, addressing both physical and psychological aspects. A way to achieve this is by enabling sufficient time for patient-HCP interaction, improving continuity of care and strengthening interdisciplinary collaboration. Key implications for practice include targeted training in the psychosocial aspects of GD and the integration of a contact registered nurse with specialised knowledge in thyroid diseases, which may improve both care quality and the HCP work environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.