ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2026
Season-dependent phenological responses and implications for co-occurring plants and butterflies under climate anomalies and extreme weather events.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Season-dependent phenological responses and implications for co-occurring plants and butterflies under climate anomalies and extreme weather events.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite extensive work on climate-driven phenological shifts, research has focused primarily on early-season events, single metrics and gradual shifts in mean climate, limiting insights into phenological responses across the full annual cycle. Using a 17-year dataset (2009-2025) from an old-growth forest, we examined how co-occurring plants and butterflies responded to climate anomalies and extreme weather events (EWEs) across multiple phenological metrics and seasons, and whether variation in their phenological overlap had ecological implications. Including EWEs substantially improved model performance, particularly for butterfly phenology, and revealed shifts opposite to those driven by climate anomalies, indicating distinct effects on phenology. Responses were also markedly season- and taxon-specific. When plants and butterflies diverged, the pattern varied between seasons: in spring, differences were primarily in magnitude, whereas in summer, they more often involved opposite directions (i.e. one taxon advanced while the other was delayed). However, these differential responses did not translate into changes in phenological overlap in response to climate anomalies or EWEs. Greater overlap was nonetheless associated with higher butterfly diversity, and this association was season-dependent. Our findings suggest that both phenological responses and their ecological consequences may depend strongly on seasonal context, highlighting the importance of considering seasonality and EWEs alongside mean climatic conditions when assessing phenological shifts under climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.