ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2026
Fear of humans mediates spatiotemporal interactions between endangered large Asian felids.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fear of humans mediates spatiotemporal interactions between endangered large Asian felids.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Species competitive interactions influence carnivore demography. Humans, as global 'super predators,' may mediate interactions among sympatric carnivores, although the effects of ecological fear on these interactions remain less understood. We used two years of camera trap data from more than 300 sites in northeast China to fit two-species, dynamic occupancy models. We then assessed how direct human passage affects spatial and temporal interactions between tigers and leopards, and the consequences for predator‒prey overlap in a temperate forest. We found evidence that median site occupancy, colonization and detection of leopards were lower at sites where tigers were present than at sites where tigers were absent. The effect of tigers on leopards in both space and time varied with disturbances. Leopards and tigers co-occurred less often than would be expected by chance at sites where human activity was greater. Tigers, but not leopards, significantly shifted their activity towards increased nocturnality in response to predominantly diurnal humans. This resulted in a decrease in temporal overlap among the two top predators and predator-ungulate prey at more disturbed sites, most notably between the tiger and prey (but no decrease in spatial overlap). Leopards appear to avoid tigers through time or space in areas where encounter risks are increased; in particular, leopards shift their core activity range as a main strategy to cope with dominant tiger and human activity across the sites. These results reveal that the human-induced landscape of fear may modify the strength of intraguild interactions between apex felids and structure food webs in a shared ecosystem. Furthermore, we highlight the importance of considering the pervasive risk introduced by a dynamic human presence to better understand the adaptive strategies used by competing top predators to mitigate threats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.