ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2026
Comparing apples and oranges (and pinecones): understanding patterns of reproductive disparity across seed plants.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparing apples and oranges (and pinecones): understanding patterns of reproductive disparity across seed plants.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Seed plant reproductive structures are highly diverse, but analysing morphological disparity across the group is challenging because taxa are difficult to directly compare. Here, we develop an approach that accommodates divergent structures and unclear homologies, treating basic structural units as analogous and analysing characters within these units. We scored 284 acrogymnosperm and angiosperm cones and flower-fruits for 47 discrete characters and calculated morphological distances based on character mismatches among organ sets, treating character absence as a state. We then performed two analyses: one focused on the diversity of structural units and another focused on character diversity, where information from all structural units was collapsed into a single space. In both analyses, we found low reproductive disparity within most acrogymnosperm lineages but high disparity across them. Major angiosperm clades, by contrast, consistently show high disparity and occupy broad, overlapping regions of morphospace. Seed plant groups therefore appear to evolve disparity in fundamentally different ways: acrogymnosperms exhibit high levels among major lineages while angiosperms show high disparity both within and among major lineages. The approach we use to identify these patterns is also generalizable to other systems with serial homology and/or highly divergent morphologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.