Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42838555›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2026

Social relationships promote access to food and information in wild jackdaws.

Luca G Hahn, Guillam E McIvor, Ines Fürtbauer, Andrew J King, Alex Thornton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luca G HahnCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter , Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5187-1039
Guillam E McIvorCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter , Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3922-7651
Ines FürtbauerBiosciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University , Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1404-6280
Andrew J KingBiosciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University , Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6870-9767
Alex ThorntonCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter , Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1607-2047

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilLeverhulme Trust RGP-2020-170South West Biosciences Doctoral Training Partnership BB/T008741/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many animals form differentiated social relationships that can influence fitness, but the mechanisms behind these benefits are often unclear. How does the presence of social partners during foraging enhance access to food or information? Might individuals also incur short-term costs, for example, by foregoing feeding opportunities to remain with and support social partners? Here, we investigated how social relationships shape foraging decisions and outcomes in wild jackdaws (Corvus monedula) using automated radio frequency identification (RFID) feeding stations where two birds could perch but only one could feed, with the other queueing behind ('dyadic events'). Bonded social partners (pair-bonded mates and kin) engaged in these dyadic events more frequently than other dyads and they coordinated their visits, as shown by shorter dyadic arrival latencies. Bonded partners also showed higher social tolerance and possibly social support, with feeding individuals benefitting from a lower probability of being displaced when a partner was present. Queuing individuals accepted short-term time costs to remain with their social partners. For juveniles, following their parents probably promoted access to social information about feeder use. These findings show that social relationships influence decision-making and foraging performance in the wild, revealing both benefits and costs of maintaining close bonds. Short-term effects on foraging success may therefore contribute to long-term fitness advantages of strong social relationships.

Indexed as

CrowsFeeding BehaviorSocial BehaviorAnimalsFemaleMaleRadio Frequency Identification Devicesocial foragingsocial learningsocial relationshipssocial tolerance

Identifiers

PMID42838555
PMCPMC13641922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.