Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42838086›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2026

Hair Follicle-Derived Grafting for Chronic Cutaneous Wounds: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes.

Mara Hartoyo, Mounika Vattigunta, Jose A Jaller

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mara HartoyoUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3314-0096
Mounika VattiguntaUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1177-6594
Jose A JallerDr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8394-3503

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate clinical outcomes of autologous follicular unit and scalp-derived grafting techniques in the treatment of chronic cutaneous wounds. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were searched through February 2026. Studies evaluating follicular unit grafts, split-thickness scalp grafts or hair follicle-derived biologic preparations for chronic wounds were included. The primary endpoint was the proportion of wounds achieving complete re-epithelialization during study follow-up. Secondary outcomes included overall closure rates, time to closure, wound area reduction and adverse events. Sixteen studies comprising 239 patients were included. Follicular unit grafts demonstrated high overall closure rates (84% across 80 wounds). Split-thickness scalp grafts achieved 100% complete healing across 54 wounds, with rapid healing times (24-35 days). Biologic follicular preparations showed variable efficacy, with closure rates ranging from 30% to 100% across 70 wounds. Comparative studies consistently demonstrated superior wound healing with hair follicle-containing grafts relative to inter-wound or between-patient controls. Adverse events were limited and mild. Hair follicle-based grafting may be a potential solution for chronic nonhealing wounds, particularly in recalcitrant wounds. However, heterogeneity in study design and outcome reporting highlights the need for standardized, high-quality trials.

Indexed as

Hair FollicleSkin TransplantationWound HealingChronic DiseaseHumansTransplantation, AutologousTreatment Outcomehair follicleleg ulcerskin transplantationtransplantationwound healing

Identifiers

PMID42838086
PMCPMC13641881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.