SynthesisInternational wound journal2026
Hair Follicle-Derived Grafting for Chronic Cutaneous Wounds: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate clinical outcomes of autologous follicular unit and scalp-derived grafting techniques in the treatment of chronic cutaneous wounds. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were searched through February 2026. Studies evaluating follicular unit grafts, split-thickness scalp grafts or hair follicle-derived biologic preparations for chronic wounds were included. The primary endpoint was the proportion of wounds achieving complete re-epithelialization during study follow-up. Secondary outcomes included overall closure rates, time to closure, wound area reduction and adverse events. Sixteen studies comprising 239 patients were included. Follicular unit grafts demonstrated high overall closure rates (84% across 80 wounds). Split-thickness scalp grafts achieved 100% complete healing across 54 wounds, with rapid healing times (24-35 days). Biologic follicular preparations showed variable efficacy, with closure rates ranging from 30% to 100% across 70 wounds. Comparative studies consistently demonstrated superior wound healing with hair follicle-containing grafts relative to inter-wound or between-patient controls. Adverse events were limited and mild. Hair follicle-based grafting may be a potential solution for chronic nonhealing wounds, particularly in recalcitrant wounds. However, heterogeneity in study design and outcome reporting highlights the need for standardized, high-quality trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.