Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42837672›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2026

Digital Twin-Assisted Risk Disclosure in Adults Undergoing Elective Bronchoscopy: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mingming Deng, Weidong Xu, Fei Tang, Hong Chen, Zhen Yang, Feng Wang, Nan Zhang, Haihong Wu, Jia Li, Ziwen Zheng and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mingming Deng *National Center for Respiratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, 2 Yinghuayuan East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China, 86 10 84205729.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8978-3309
Weidong Xu *National Center for Respiratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, 2 Yinghuayuan East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China, 86 10 84205729.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7120-1916
Fei Tang *Department of Interventional Pulmonology and Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Anhui Chest Hospital, Hefei, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7016-8595
Hong Chen *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8917-1812
Zhen YangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2954-2879
Feng WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2429-5662
Nan ZhangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Emergency General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1352-1839
Haihong WuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hainan General Hospital, Hainan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9397-1222
Jia LiNational Center for Respiratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, 2 Yinghuayuan East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China, 86 10 84205729.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1180-5720
Ziwen ZhengNational Center for Respiratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, 2 Yinghuayuan East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China, 86 10 84205729.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1711-6328
Sinan WuNational Center for Respiratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Research and Data Management, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9168-0993
Gang Hou *National Center for Respiratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, 2 Yinghuayuan East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China, 86 10 84205729.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3438-1764

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Risk disclosure before bronchoscopy should provide sufficient information for informed consent, but detailed text-based risk disclosure may increase procedural anxiety. Patient-specific visualization with a digital twin-based bronchoscopy simulator may help patients understand bronchoscopy and its risks in a more individualized manner. Objective: This study evaluated whether digital twin-assisted risk disclosure reduces prebronchoscopy anxiety and improves postbronchoscopy satisfaction compared with conventional risk disclosure in adults scheduled for elective bronchoscopy. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Adults aged 18 years or older scheduled for elective bronchoscopy under local anesthesia were included. Participants were randomized to either a digital-twin informed-consent group, which received standard written information plus a physician-led oral explanation supported by a patient-specific simulator visualization, or a conventional informed-consent group, which received the same written information plus a standard physician-led oral explanation without simulator visualization. Owing to the nature of the intervention, participants and physicians were not blinded. The primary outcome was the change in self-reported anxiety after risk disclosure, measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the modified Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Linear mixed models with a group-by-time interaction were used for the main analysis. The secondary outcome was postbronchoscopy satisfaction. Results: Of 150 patients assessed for eligibility, 122 were randomized and analyzed, with 61 participants in each group. Compared with conventional risk disclosure, digital twin-assisted disclosure produced greater reductions in anxiety on the VAS (group by time β=-15.89, SE 3.08, 95% CI -21.99 to -9.78; Conclusions: Patient-specific digital twin-visualization during physician-led risk disclosure reduced short-term self-reported anxiety and modestly improved satisfaction. The innovation lies in using each patient's computed tomography-derived airway and lesion anatomy during consent rather than standardized text, audiovisual content, or graphic narratives evaluated previously. This multicenter trial extends digital-twin technology from bronchoscopy training to individualized risk communication. In clinical practice, the approach could supplement physician-led consent in units with computed tomography and simulator infrastructure; however, time-matched studies should establish objective benefits, workflow burden, cost-effectiveness, accessibility, and applicability to highly anxious or resource-limited populations before wider adoption.

Indexed as

BronchoscopyDisclosureElective Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedAnxietyFemaleHumansInformed ConsentMaleMiddle Agedanxietybronchoscopydigital-twininformed consentsimulator

Identifiers

PMID42837672
PMCPMC13641757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.