Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42837537›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2026

AI-Powered Framework for Personalized Prescription of Physical Activity in Aging: Proposing PEPHA, a framework for Personalized Phenotyping for Aging.

Igor Matias, Melanie Mack, Matthias Kliegel, Katarzyna Wac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Igor MatiasQuality of Life Technologies Lab, University of Geneva, Route de Drize 7, Battelle A, Carouge, Geneva, 1227, Switzerland, 41 223790234.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0503-0244
Melanie MackCognitive Aging Lab, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5512-0339
Matthias KliegelCognitive Aging Lab, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2001-2522
Katarzyna WacQuality of Life Technologies Lab, University of Geneva, Route de Drize 7, Battelle A, Carouge, Geneva, 1227, Switzerland, 41 223790234.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8060-399X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Personalizing physical activity recommendations for older adults requires understanding not only which dimensions of physical activity and sedentary behaviors (24-h movement behaviors) influence health outcomes but also when, within an individual's everyday life, these dimensions are most relevant. Current observational and interventional approaches rarely capture the temporal dynamics linking everyday patterns of 24-hour movement behaviors to cognitive and mental health trajectories, 2 key determinants of healthy aging. Objective: This study introduces and evaluates PEPHA (Personalized Phenotyping for Aging), an interpretable artificial intelligence (AI) framework designed to identify which dimensions of behavior and when within an observation window are strongly associated with cognitive functioning and depressive symptoms in older adults. Methods: We introduce PEPHA, an interpretable AI framework that integrates passive, high-frequency wearable data (physical activity and sleep) with periodic, active, validated cognitive and affective assessments (waves). Using longitudinal data from the Results: Personalized analyses showed that roughly 40% of individuals exhibited moderate or large temporal order effects of 24-hour movement behavior in the outcomes. For 1 exemplar participant (male, above the mean sample age), we localized 2 potential temporal association windows approximately 60 days and 30 days before the assessment of his processing speed, suggesting periods during which this individual may have been more sensitive to favorable or unfavorable behavioral configurations. Across participants, PEPHA revealed distinct 24-hour movement behavioral patterns correlated with cognitive functioning and mental health. Processing speed was best explained by locomotor activity, while depressive symptoms were best explained by sedentary behavior. Five control variables (education, cognitive reserve, diet, sex, and subjective age difference) were noninformative, whereas chronological age had predictive power regarding depressive symptoms. Conclusions: PEPHA demonstrates that continuous passive wearable data can uncover individualized, time-specific behavioral patterns associated with cognitive functioning and mental health. Although exploratory, this framework transforms observational data into interpretable, timing-aware insights that can help identify periods of increased behavioral sensitivity or association, thereby informing future personalized, AI-supported physical activity interventions in aging.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecognitive agingdepressiondigital phenotypingexplainable AIpersonalized interventionphysical activityprocessing speedtemporal modelingwearables

Identifiers

PMID42837537
PMCPMC13641313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.