Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42837536›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2026

Evaluating Acceptance and Use of Digital Health Platforms for Consultation and Medication Delivery Among Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender People Living With HIV: Cross-Sectional Survey Informed by an Extended UTAUT Approach.

Emmanuel Oluwatosin Oluokun, Festus Fatai Adedoyin, Huseyin Dogan, Nan Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emmanuel Oluwatosin Oluokun *School of Computing and Engineering, Faculty of Media, Science & Technology, Bournemouth University, Fern Barrow, Poole, England, BH12 5BB, United Kingdom, 44 01202524111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5391-4048
Festus Fatai Adedoyin *School of Computing and Engineering, Faculty of Media, Science & Technology, Bournemouth University, Fern Barrow, Poole, England, BH12 5BB, United Kingdom, 44 01202524111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3586-2570
Huseyin Dogan *School of Computing and Engineering, Faculty of Media, Science & Technology, Bournemouth University, Fern Barrow, Poole, England, BH12 5BB, United Kingdom, 44 01202524111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9138-9319
Nan Jiang *School of Computing and Engineering, Faculty of Media, Science & Technology, Bournemouth University, Fern Barrow, Poole, England, BH12 5BB, United Kingdom, 44 01202524111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1510-9888

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Digital health platforms can expand access to HIV care, but among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender people living with HIV and AIDS in Nigeria, adoption is shaped by structural stigma, criminalization, and fear of disclosure as much as by system functionality. Teleconsultation and medication-delivery platforms offer alternative pathways to care, but their acceptance within marginalized populations cannot be assumed and requires empirical investigation. Objective: This study aimed to examine the factors influencing behavioral intention (BI) to adopt TechAids, a confidentiality-oriented digital health platform designed to support HIV consultation and service access among MSM and transgender individuals in Nigeria, using an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Lagos, Nigeria, through HIV service delivery and outreach settings facilitated by partnering nongovernmental organizations, supplemented by online LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minorities) networks. The study used nonprobability convenience sampling with prespecified eligibility criteria. Data collection was conducted from January 2025 to May 2025. The sample comprised 141 platform users and 27 health care providers (N=168). An extended UTAUT model incorporated performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), social influence (SI), facilitating conditions (FC), trust, and perceived stigma (PS). Data were analyzed using correlation analysis and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression. Age and educational attainment were examined as potential moderating variables. Qualitative feedback was also collected to contextualize quantitative findings. Results: FC emerged as the strongest predictor of BI to use the platform (β=.813; Conclusions: In resource-constrained, highly stigmatized contexts, enabling infrastructure and practical support may outweigh cognitive, social, and attitudinal determinants of technology acceptance. Successful digital health interventions for marginalized populations therefore require privacy-conscious, user-centered design alongside sustained investment in the infrastructure that supports real-world use.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MalePatient Acceptance of Health CareTelemedicineTransgender PersonsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNigeriaSocial StigmaYoung Adultdigital healthHIV/AIDSmHealthmobile healthstigmatechnology acceptancetransgenderUnified Theory of Acceptance and Use of TechnologyUTAUT

Identifiers

PMID42837536
PMCPMC13641318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.