ArticlePloS one2026
An adaptive current-voltage step size solver for accurate and efficient modeling of solar photovoltaic modules.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate modeling of photovoltaic (PV) modules is critical for system design, energy yield prediction, and maximum power point tracking (MPPT). Conventional single-diode models (SDM) provide a balance between simplicity and physical realism but require iterative numerical methods to solve the implicit current-voltage (I-V) equation, often leading to slow convergence and reduced stability under dynamic conditions. This paper introduces a novel adaptive current-voltage step-size solver (AIVSS) that dynamically adjusts both voltage and current increments based on the local slope of the I-V curve, thereby improving numerical accuracy and convergence efficiency. The proposed method was validated through 500 simulations under standard test conditions (STC), partial shading, high temperature, and dynamic irradiance, and was compared with the conventional adaptive voltage-step solver (AVSS). Performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), iteration count, and computation time. Results show that AIVSS reduced the average iteration count by 35-40%, decreased the average MAE from 6.15 W to 2.18 W, and reduced the average RMSE from 7.68 W to 2.85 W across all operating conditions. In addition, the proposed method achieved faster convergence and smoother dynamic response under rapidly changing irradiance. These findings confirm the strong potential of AIVSS for real-time PV system simulation and MPPT applications, providing a robust and computationally efficient tool for accurate PV module characterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.