Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42837384›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Revisiting the relation between oral contraceptive use and attentional engagement in everyday life: The role of formulation.

Alyssa C Smith, Daniel Smilek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alyssa C SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7908-9401
Daniel SmilekDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral contraceptives (OCs) are composed of artificial estrogen (ethinyl-estradiol) and/or progesterone (progestin), which can attach to receptors in the brain and potentially influence cognition. One prior study suggested that OC use was associated with increased mind-wandering - implying that OC use was associated with detriments to attention. In contrast, two subsequent well-powered conceptual replications of this initial finding revealed little evidence that OC use was related to increases in inattentiveness (including mind-wandering). However, these later studies collapsed across different OC formulations, which may obscure effects specific to particular formulations. In the present study, we investigated the possibility that OC formulation might differentially relate to attention-related traits. To do this, we collected trait-level reports of the tendency to experience attention related errors, attention lapses, spontaneous and deliberate mind-wandering, boredom, and flow in undergraduate females using OCs, and we collected the brand of OC used from which it was possible to derive the formulation. OC formulations differed in ethinyl-estradiol dose, progestin dose, dosing schedule, hormonal activity (or potency), and the type (or 'generation') of progestin used. We found no evidence that different OC formulations were related to differences in attention-related traits, which suggests that OC users can be treated as a homogenous group when examining trait-level attention. Comparisons of OC users (collapsing across formulation) to non-users again revealed no significant differences in trait-level attention.

Indexed as

AttentionContraceptives, OralAdolescentAdultEthinyl EstradiolFemaleHumansProgesteroneProgestinsYoung AdultContraceptives, OralEthinyl EstradiolProgesteroneProgestins

Identifiers

PMID42837384
PMCPMC13641381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.