ArticlePloS one2026
Equivalent-circuit-based multi-objective parameter design and Pareto analysis of an LCC-S wireless power transfer system.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parameter selection in an LCC-S compensated wireless power transfer system is difficult because the circuit variables are coupled and an increase in output power does not necessarily lead to higher transmission efficiency. In this study, the primary compensation inductance, equivalent load resistance, and mutual inductance were treated as three design variables, and their selection was formulated as a two-objective optimization problem. The search was performed using an archive-based particle swarm optimization method that combines dynamic inertia adjustment, probabilistic velocity pausing, and stagnation reset. MOPSO, NSGA-II, and MOGWO were used as comparison methods in 10 independent runs. Hypervolume, Spacing, the number of nondominated solutions, and runtime were recorded. Relative to MOPSO, the proposed method increased mean hypervolume by 8.45%, reduced Spacing by 41.14%, and reduced the observed MATLAB runtime by 26.30%. The obtained Pareto front contained candidates corresponding to a high-output-power boundary, an intermediate power-efficiency trade-off, and high-efficiency operation. Three representative candidates were further examined using a switching-level Simulink model together with model-calculated current and loss indicators. These results are intended to support preliminary parameter selection for LCC-S systems; hardware calibration is still required before the reported candidates can be used as practical operating points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.