ArticlePloS one2026
Exposure to residential greenness and subsequent risk of common mental disorders among individuals with COVID-19 in South Korea: A nationwide cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResidential greenness is considered protective for mental health, but its impact on clinically diagnosed psychiatric disorders following COVID-19 remains unclear. This study investigated the association between residential greenness and risk of common mental disorders after COVID-19, and whether this relationship differed by population subgroup.
methodsWe conducted a nationwide cohort study of 3,097,179 adults aged ≥19 years with confirmed COVID-19 in South Korea between 2018 and 2023 using the K-COV-N cohort, which integrates administrative and clinical data from the National Health Insurance Service and COVID-19 data from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Residential greenness was assessed using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and categorized as low (0.2- < 0.4), moderate (0.4- < 0.6), or high (≥0.6). The primary outcome was first diagnosis of anxiety disorder, depression, insomnia, or bipolar disorder ≥30 days post-infection. Weighted Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs).
resultsCompared to low NDVI, moderate NDVI was associated with reduced risk of any common mental disorder (aHR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96-0.98), with the strongest effect for bipolar disorder (0.84; 0.79-0.88). High NDVI showed no overall benefit (1.00; 0.99-1.01) and was associated with increased anxiety risk (1.04; 1.03-1.06), especially in older adults and those with comorbidities. Younger individuals experienced the greatest benefit from moderate greenness.
conclusionModerate residential greenness was linked to lower risk of mental disorders following COVID-19, while high greenness conferred limited benefit and potential risk. Greening strategies should be paired with strengthened health and social infrastructure to reduce disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.