Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42837342›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Effects of homologous oviductal epithelial cell co-culture on in vitro embryo development in livestock species: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Muloongo C Sitali, Mawiini Mwandabantu, Madalitso Chelenga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muloongo C SitaliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4406-1115
Mawiini MwandabantuDepartment of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2309-1624
Madalitso ChelengaDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, The Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9926-1603

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this protocol is to outline the approach for a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the effects of homologous oviductal epithelial cell (OEC) co-culture on in vitro embryo developmental outcomes, including cleavage, blastocyst, expanded blastocyst, and hatched blastocyst development, as well as blastocyst quality assessed by total blastocyst cell number, in livestock species.

methodsThe protocol is developed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P). The protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261405630). The approach is based on the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome and Study design (PICOS) framework to answer the following research questions: 1) Does homologous oviductal epithelial cell (OEC) co-culture with oocytes, presumptive zygotes or embryos improve in vitro embryo developmental outcomes compared with culture systems without OEC co-culture in sheep, cattle, pigs, and goats? 2) What are the factors influencing the effectiveness of the OEC co-culture systems, such as the stage of OEC inclusion in the embryo production system, i.e., during oocyte maturation, fertilization, embryo culture, or combined stages? The process will include: 1) development of the search strategy and inclusion criteria; 2) data extraction; 3) risk of bias assessment; and 4) data analysis. The risk of bias of the included in vitro studies will be evaluated using the National Toxicology Program-Office of Health Assessment and Translation (NTP-OHAT) Risk of Bias Tool. Given the anticipated heterogeneity in study designs, species, OEC models, and culture conditions, meta-analyses will be conducted using a random-effects model, with pooled effect estimates calculated using the inverse-variance method. Species will be assessed as a main effect, whereas subgroup analyses will be performed according to the oviductal cell co-culture systems and/or the stage at which OEC co-culture is introduced within the in vitro embryo production system. For studies where numerical data are insufficient for meta-analysis or cannot be extracted, findings will be synthesized descriptively. Publication bias will be assessed using funnel plots and, where appropriate, Egger's regression test, while sensitivity analyses will be conducted using the leave-one-out method.

conclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis will provide a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence on the effect of OEC-oocyte/embryo co-culture systems. The findings will help clarify the current state of knowledge, identify key research gaps, provide a foundation for future studies aimed at optimizing in vitro embryo production systems, and improve our understanding of potential sources of heterogeneity across studies.

Indexed as

Embryonic DevelopmentEpithelial CellsFallopian TubesLivestockOviductsAnimalsBlastocystCattleCoculture TechniquesEmbryo Culture TechniquesFemaleFertilization in VitroMeta-Analysis as TopicSwineSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID42837342
PMCPMC13641352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.