ArticlePloS one2026
How would you like to be helped? A concept mapping study of potential factors promoting integrated approaches for people with mental-health problems to find gainful employment.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For enabling people with mental-health problems to find work, an integrated approach is needed. It would combine mental-health services with social services for securing income and social benefits. This study used concept mapping, a mixed-method participatory research methodology that combines qualitative and quantitative techniques to identify factors that would promote such an approach. The participants included (a) experts with lived experience in mental-health problems, (b) client organizations, employers, and the General Employers' Association Netherlands (AWVN), as well as municipal return-to-work professionals, mental healthcare providers, and the Netherlands Employees Insurance Agency (UWV). Together, they collaborate to guide, support, and facilitate people's reintegration into the workforce. Participants were recruited between May and September 2018. In Phase One, 63 participants brainstormed how to improve collaboration between the different parties in finding and retaining employment for people with a mental illness. In Phase Two, participants sorted the statements from Phase One into categories based on thematic similarity, and they rated them on priority. Multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis were performed to produce multidimensional maps to visualize the findings. In the brainstorming phase, participants generated 143 statements which were reduced to 60 statements to be included in Phase Two. In the sorting task, six clusters were created as follows: Provide time and space for collaboration, collaborate, provide a safe landing for employees, focus on common goals, facilitate and connect craftsmanship, and address the impact of work on health and recovery. Because experts with lived experience and employers were underrepresented in the development of the concept map, two additional focus groups were organized to verify the results of the concept map. One group included experts with lived experience, and the other one included employers. The results of these focus groups confirmed those of the group concept mapping. Ways to improve an integrated approach are discussed. We distinguished six clusters of potential factors that might foster an integrated approach: "Provide time and space for collaboration", "collaborate", "provide a smooth transition for employees", "focus on common goals", "facilitate and connect craftsmanship" and "pay attention to the impact of work on health and recovery".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.