ArticleEndocrine2026
The joint association of loneliness, social isolation, and satisfaction with major depressive disorder incidence in individuals with diabetes.
Article in Endocrine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the joint associations of life satisfaction, loneliness and social isolation in relation to the risk of incident major depressive disorder (MDD) in diabetes patients.
methodsA total of 7712 participants with diagnosed diabetes at baseline from the UK Biobank were included. Cox proportional hazards models and interaction analyses were used to examine associations of loneliness, social isolation, and life satisfaction with MDD.
resultsDuring a median follow-up time of 11.1 years, 442 participants developed MDD (incidence rate: 5.73%). Participants with high loneliness, high social isolation, and low life satisfaction were associated with 176%, 82%, and 493% higher risks of MDD compared to those with low loneliness, low social isolation, and high life satisfaction, respectively (all P < 0.001). Several statistically significant interactions between loneliness and different aspects of life satisfaction were identified in relation to incident MDD. Participants with both low life satisfaction and high loneliness were at 8.06 times the risk of MDD than those with high life satisfaction and low loneliness.
conclusionIn individuals with diabetes, higher loneliness and social isolation are associated with increased MDD risk, whereas higher life satisfaction was associated with a lower risk. The joint associations varied across levels and domains of life satisfaction, although interaction patterns were not consistent across all measures or statistical scales. These findings may help identify individuals at elevated risk of MDD but should be interpreted cautiously given the observational design, potential residual confounding, and measurement limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42837085What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.