ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Automated CT-based quantification of knee osteophytes for robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a multi-cohort study.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preoperative computed tomography (CT) is routinely acquired for planning robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA), yet osteophyte burden is not quantitatively characterized. We developed automated CT-based osteophyte quantification and evaluated it against blinded de novo expert-consensus annotations and an intraoperative accessible resected osteophyte volume reference. A human-in-the-loop 3-dimensional U-Net was developed using 387 knee CT scans. The frozen model was evaluated against blinded de novo expert-consensus annotations in two independent external cohorts (100 knees each). Spatial and volume agreement were assessed using Dice coefficient, surface Dice at 1-mm tolerance, 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), mean absolute error, and Bland-Altman analysis. In a prospective cohort of 66 robotic-assisted TKAs, CT-derived total osteophyte volume was compared with the water-displacement volume of accessible osteophytes that were resected and recovered intraoperatively (accessible resected osteophyte volume reference). In the external cohorts, median total Dice was 0.913 and 0.909, surface Dice was 0.944 and 0.945, HD95 was 1.16 and 1.09 mm, and volume ICC was 0.977 and 0.972, respectively. Automated estimates showed conservative volume bias relative to expert consensus (- 0.499 and - 0.365 cc). In the surgical cohort, automated CT-derived volume showed cohort-level agreement with the accessible resected osteophyte volume reference (ICC, 0.876; mean absolute error, 1.224 cc; mean difference, + 0.401 cc; 95% limits of agreement, - 2.785 to + 3.586 cc). Automated CT-based osteophyte quantification showed consistent spatial and volumetric agreement with blinded de novo expert-consensus annotations across two external cohorts and cohort-level agreement with the accessible resected osteophyte volume reference. This scalable method provides a preoperative measure of osteophyte burden for arthroplasty research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.