ArticleEuropean journal of ageing2026
Predictors of self-rated health in older adults: insights from an anchoring vignettes study.
Article in European journal of ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Self-rated health is one of the most used measures of subjective health in research. At the same time, it presents several methodological challenges. Self-rated health requires individuals to translate their complex, multifaceted health experiences into a single response on the self-rated health scale. When different groups interpret and rate their health differently e.g. by gender or birth cohorts, the risk of misinterpretation increases. Older adults tend to rate their health as good or very good despite the increasing physical degeneration associated with ageing. To address these challenges, the anchoring vignette method was developed to improve the comparability of survey responses. In this study, anchoring vignettes were used to investigate the association between demographic and health-related predictors and both unadjusted and adjusted self-rated health in later life. Data were collected through the Swedish Citizen Panel; a total of 4,300 individuals aged 60-85 were invited, stratified by age and sex. 3,083 participants completed more than 80% of the questionnaire. The associations between demographic and health-related factors and self-rated health changed between the unadjusted and adjusted analyses. In the unadjusted analysis, women reported better health than men; this reversed in the CHOPIT model. After adjustment, there was no significant association between self-rated health and age or educational level. Living with others remained positively associated with self-rated health, whereas dependency in daily activities, number of diseases, and somatic symptoms remained negatively associated. We conclude that anchoring vignettes can be a suitable tool for evaluating self-rated health in later life and a valuable addition to simpler, traditional approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.