ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2026
Osteoporosis in Pediatric Orthopaedics: Congenital Diseases, Medical Management, and Perioperative Considerations.
Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewPediatric osteoporosis is a heterogeneous group of primary and secondary disorders that creates challenges for orthopaedic surgeons. This review summarizes evidence on conditions commonly encountered in pediatric orthopedic practice, medical management strategies, and perioperative care for children with bone fragility. RECENT
findingsDiagnostic approaches have been evolving toward integrating fracture characteristics, skeletal risk factors, and bone mineral density (BMD). A single low-trauma vertebral compression fracture is now sufficient for diagnosis of osteoporosis in children regardless of BMD. Intravenous bisphosphonates remain first-line therapy, with recent meta-analyses confirming consistent BMD gains and, observationally, a reduction in fracture risk. Bisphosphonates are generally given to children who have sustained low-trauma vertebral fractures and considered for other children with recurrent long bone fractures with low BMD. Early intervention with bisphosphonates may also be warranted for children with high-risk diseases, such as Duchenne's Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). Biologic agents are emerging in clinical trials and select specialized use, but further research is needed to understand their role in pediatric osteoporosis. Denosumab carries a substantial risk for rebound hypercalcemia in children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), limiting its use to selected indications. Preliminary reporting from a large trial of anti-sclerostin therapy in children with osteogenesis imperfecta suggests significant BMD increases while fracture-reduction endpoints were not met, underscoring the limitations of BMD as a surrogate in pediatric bone fragility trials. Providing optimal care for this unique group of patients requires multidisciplinary coordination amongst orthopaedic surgeons, endocrinologists, geneticists, and rehabilitation specialists. Evidence-based management includes preoperative bone health evaluation, procedure-specific modifications in fragile bone, nutritional optimization, and coordinated bisphosphonate timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.