ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2026
Quality of life in hyperkalemia: baseline analysis of a cohort study of management of hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease or heart failure in Japan.
Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05297409 (Hyperkalemia Registry An Observational Prospective Cohort Study for Long-term Management of Hyperkalemia in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease or Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Hyperkalemia Registry An Observational Prospective Cohort Study for Long-term Management of Hyperkalemia in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease or Heart Failure
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHyperkalemia is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and chronic heart failure (CHF), often leading to treatment dilemmas regarding renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors. Although potassium binders and dietary restrictions are central to chronic management, their quality-of-life (QOL) impact remains insufficiently described. This study aimed to characterize real-world treatment patterns and evaluate treatment impact on QOL.
methodsWe analyzed baseline data from a prospective cohort in Japanese nephrology and cardiology outpatient clinics. Participants were adults with CKD (≥ stage G3) or CHF (New York Heart Association class II-IV) who initiated potassium binders within 6 months. Clinical data, serum potassium values, and patient-reported outcomes (generic QOL, disease/treatment-specific QOL, and adherence measures) were obtained at enrollment.
resultsAmong 347 patients, the median age was 75 years, and 74% were male; 93% had CKD. At enrollment, 59% were prescribed a RAAS inhibitor. Dietary therapy was implemented in 29%. Physical scores of generic QOL were lower than population norms, whereas mental scores were comparable. Treatment-specific QOL scores suggested that potassium binders may have had a relatively small impact on QOL compared with dietary therapy. Adherence to potassium binders was high.
conclusionsConcurrent use of RAAS inhibitors and potassium binders was common, consistent with a role for binders in supporting RAAS inhibitor continuation. Potassium binders showed little perceived impact, indicating that pharmacologic potassium control may be acceptable to patients managing multiple lifestyle limitations. STUDY REGISTRATION: The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05297409).
Indexed as
Identifiers
42837068What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.