ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2026
AntiLipo: A Comprehensive Database, Deep Learning-Based Prediction Model, and Computational Study of Anti-Hyperlipidemic Peptides.
Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anti-hyperlipidemic peptides (ALPs) play important roles in regulating lipid metabolism and preventing atherosclerosis, yet conventional experimental identification methods remain time-consuming. In this study, we curated 201 experimentally validated ALPs with their sequences, sources, activity data, and metabolic pathways. Network pharmacology analysis revealed that ALPs primarily participate in canonical lipid-regulatory pathways, including AMPK and PPAR signaling, fatty acid metabolism, and cholesterol metabolism, as well as adipocytokine signaling and insulin resistance-related pathways. Based on this dataset, we developed five classification models (CNN, ESM-transformer, MLP, PhyChem-transformer, and Transformer). The transformer model achieved the best overall performance (Accuracy = 0.70, MCC = 0.40), while the MLP model attained the highest AUROC (0.76). For peptide-protein bioactivity prediction, five regression models were evaluated, with the self-attention model achieving the best performance (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
42837063What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.