ArticleBiodegradation2026
Catabolism of diethyl ether as a sole carbon and energy source by Mycolicibacterium sp. ELW1.
Article in Biodegradation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The model isobutylene (IB)-metabolizing strain Mycolicibacterium sp. ELW1 grew aerobically on diethyl ether (DEE) as a sole carbon and energy source. DEE supported an equivalent biomass yield to IB despite strong effects of DEE concentration on growth rate and lag phase. Differential expression analysis of the transcriptome revealed extensive transcriptional remodeling during growth on DEE compared to fructose, including the substantial upregulation of chromosomally-encoded alcohol and acetaldehyde dehydrogenases, and the plasmid‑encoded isobutylene monooxygenase (IMO). In resting‑cell assays, IB‑grown cells oxidized DEE twice as rapidly as DEE‑grown cells and ethanol and acetaldehyde temporarily accumulated during DEE oxidation. In contrast, no products were detected during DEE oxidation by DEE-grown cells. Loss of the megaplasmid pELW1‑1 prevented growth on both IB and DEE while activity‑based labeling (ABL) analyses suggest the plasmid-encoded IMO is the major diyne‑reactive monooxygenase in both IB and DEE-grown cells. Supplementing cultures growing on DEE with small amounts of IB increased both DEE consumption rates and biomass yields, and this effect appears to involve decreases in the lag phase associated with growth on DEE alone. In contrast to some previous studies of DEE catabolism which have concluded DEE is unable to induce expression of soluble di-iron monooxygenases (SDIMOs), collectively, our results indicate DEE catabolism leads to substantial expression of the plasmid‑encoded IMO and is supported by expression of chromosomally encoded alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.