ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Glymphatic function in humans: indicators, modulators, and measurement strategies.
Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe glymphatic system is an important pathway for brain waste clearance and is increasingly implicated in neurodegenerative, cerebrovascular, traumatic, and sleep-related disorders. Clinical translation remains challenging because glymphatic function cannot currently be comprehensively or directly quantified in vivo in humans, and assessment relies on heterogeneous measures differing in physiological specificity and measurement directness. This review integrates human glymphatic indicators, physiological modulators, and measurement strategies within a unified framework.
methodsA narrative literature review was conducted using human studies and key foundational research identified through PubMed and Google Scholar. Assessment methods were organized according to the authors' proposed three-domain framework of glymphatic physiology (transport, exchange, and clearance outcome), recognizing that modalities may span multiple domains. Major physiological modulators and confounders were summarized, and measurement strategies were evaluated based on feasibility, reproducibility, and translational applicability.
resultsHuman glymphatic assessment relies on complementary approaches with different levels of measurement directness, including tracer-informed kinetic MRI; neurofluid proxies such as BOLD-CSF coupling and CSF flow MRI; indirect imaging correlates such as DTI-ALPS and enlarged perivascular spaces; and downstream biological correlates such as CSF solute biomarkers. Measurements can be influenced by sleep, circadian timing, respiration, cardiovascular pulsatility, posture, medications, vascular risk factors, and aging. A domain-first, tiered framework is proposed to support multimodal evaluation and interpretation.
conclusionThe proposed framework organizes multimodal glymphatic-related measures according to physiological domain and measurement directness. Standardized acquisition, harmonized analytical methods, rigorous confounder reporting, and prospective validation may improve reproducibility and support future clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42837021What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.