ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Determining core quality of life outcomes for patients with vulvar cancer and their partners: a Delphi consensus study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to develop a patient-centered and partner-centered core outcome set (COS) reflecting the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes most important to patients with vulvar cancer following surgical treatment and their partners. Identifying these outcomes enables healthcare professionals to better support patients' HRQoL during and after treatment.
methodsA mixed-methods study conducted in the Netherlands from December 2021 to March 2024 among patients with vulvar cancer, their partners, and healthcare professionals involved in their care. The study followed a three-step approach: (1) a literature review to identify HRQoL concepts and existing questionnaires; (2) interviews with patients, partners, and healthcare professionals to extract important outcomes; and (3) an online Delphi study, followed by an online consensus meeting, to prioritize outcomes. The primary outcomes were the development of patient-centered and partner-centered COS and the identification of validated questionnaires for HRQoL assessment.
resultsThe patient-centered COS comprised 45 outcomes in the domains of physiological functioning, including physical symptoms, as well as physical, sexual, and emotional functioning. The COS also included topics that are less often included in studies, i.e., wound healing, body image, and fear of recurrence. The partner-centered COS included six outcomes only focusing on information provision, not on their own HRQoL. Recommended patient HRQoL questionnaires were (scales from) EORTC QLQ-C30/VU34/SH22/INFO25 and WOUND-Q.
conclusionsThis is the first patient-centered COS for vulvar cancer, enabling targeted HRQoL assessments and improved daily clinical care. The provision of information was the only aspect deemed important as an outcome for partners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.