Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42837009›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Paediatric biobanking in the era of precision medicine: ethical, regulatory, and scientific challenges from childhood to adulthood.

Celeste Cagnazzo, Ivana Ferrero, Katia Mareschi, Franca Fagioli

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Celeste CagnazzoAzienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita-Sant'Anna, Piazza Polonia 94, 10126, Turin, Italy. celeste.cagnazzo@unito.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4055-3139
Ivana FerreroAzienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita-Sant'Anna, Piazza Polonia 94, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Katia MareschiAzienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita-Sant'Anna, Piazza Polonia 94, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Franca FagioliAzienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita-Sant'Anna, Piazza Polonia 94, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biobanks are increasingly central to precision medicine, particularly in rare diseases and paediatric oncology, where small and molecularly heterogeneous populations make access to high-quality, longitudinally annotated biological material essential. This narrative review examines the scientific value of paediatric biobanking and the ethical, regulatory, and organisational challenges that distinguish it from adult biobanking. Relevant scientific literature, European and Italian regulatory sources, international biobanking standards, and guidance on data protection and research governance were narratively reviewed, with particular attention to paediatric oncology, rare diseases, consent and assent, secondary use, interoperability, and emerging European frameworks. Paediatric biobanks can support biomarker discovery, molecular stratification, investigation of treatment resistance, and future analyses not foreseeable at the time of collection. Their governance is complicated by evolving child autonomy, the significance of dissent, transition to adulthood, future reuse of samples, and the distinction between consent to sample donation and the legal basis for processing associated personal data. Quality management, traceability, interoperable metadata, and controlled access are essential to preserve scientific utility. Emerging frameworks, including the European Health Data Space and EDPB guidance, favour a shift from one-time consent towards accountable life-cycle governance.

conclusionPaediatric biobanking should be conceived as a longitudinal research infrastructure rather than a storage activity. Sustainable models must integrate evolving autonomy, robust ethical oversight, data protection, quality, interoperability, and responsible secondary use while preserving irreplaceable biological resources for future research. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Biobanks are essential to precision medicine and are particularly valuable in rare diseases and paediatric cancer. • Paediatric biobanking raises specific issues concerning parental consent, assent, future use, and transition to adulthood. WHAT IS NEW: • Emerging European frameworks support a shift from static consent towards accountable life-cycle governance of samples and data. • A European paediatric sample-data continuum could connect biospecimens, longitudinal clinical information, omics data, and evolving participant preferences across infrastructures.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksBiomedical ResearchEthics, ResearchPediatricsPrecision MedicineAdultChildHumansInformed ConsentAssentBiobankInformed consentPaediatric oncologyPaediatricsPrecision medicineRare diseasesSecondary use

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.