ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Paediatric biobanking in the era of precision medicine: ethical, regulatory, and scientific challenges from childhood to adulthood.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biobanks are increasingly central to precision medicine, particularly in rare diseases and paediatric oncology, where small and molecularly heterogeneous populations make access to high-quality, longitudinally annotated biological material essential. This narrative review examines the scientific value of paediatric biobanking and the ethical, regulatory, and organisational challenges that distinguish it from adult biobanking. Relevant scientific literature, European and Italian regulatory sources, international biobanking standards, and guidance on data protection and research governance were narratively reviewed, with particular attention to paediatric oncology, rare diseases, consent and assent, secondary use, interoperability, and emerging European frameworks. Paediatric biobanks can support biomarker discovery, molecular stratification, investigation of treatment resistance, and future analyses not foreseeable at the time of collection. Their governance is complicated by evolving child autonomy, the significance of dissent, transition to adulthood, future reuse of samples, and the distinction between consent to sample donation and the legal basis for processing associated personal data. Quality management, traceability, interoperable metadata, and controlled access are essential to preserve scientific utility. Emerging frameworks, including the European Health Data Space and EDPB guidance, favour a shift from one-time consent towards accountable life-cycle governance.
conclusionPaediatric biobanking should be conceived as a longitudinal research infrastructure rather than a storage activity. Sustainable models must integrate evolving autonomy, robust ethical oversight, data protection, quality, interoperability, and responsible secondary use while preserving irreplaceable biological resources for future research. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Biobanks are essential to precision medicine and are particularly valuable in rare diseases and paediatric cancer. • Paediatric biobanking raises specific issues concerning parental consent, assent, future use, and transition to adulthood. WHAT IS NEW: • Emerging European frameworks support a shift from static consent towards accountable life-cycle governance of samples and data. • A European paediatric sample-data continuum could connect biospecimens, longitudinal clinical information, omics data, and evolving participant preferences across infrastructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42837009What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.