ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Machine learning-driven pharmacovigilance of antidiabetic drugs: comparative reporting patterns and classification of serious adverse events.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to evaluate the comparative adverse drug event (ADE) reporting patterns associated with antidiabetic drugs and develop machine learning (ML)-based classification models for the seriousness of reported ADEs.
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 28,633 antidiabetic-related ADEs reported to the Korea Institute of Drug Safety and Management- Korea Adverse Event Reporting System database (KAERS DB 2505A0010) from 2015 to 2024. Disproportionality analyses identified safety signals using reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Factors associated with serious adverse event (SAE) classification were assessed using multivariate logistic regression, and three ML-based classification models were developed.
resultsOlder adults accounted for 64.1% of the reported ADEs, with 2.35% classified as SAEs. Sulfonylureas demonstrated the highest SAE reporting signal (ROR 2.60, 95% CI 2.22-3.05). Male sex, older age, and sulfonylurea exposure were associated with higher odds of reports being classified as serious. Across the ML models, diabetic neuropathy treatment consistently emerged as the most influential feature contributing to SAE classification.
conclusionML-based classification complemented disproportionality analyses by identifying features associated with classification of reported ADEs as serious. Further validation using integrated longitudinal real-world data is warranted to confirm the robustness of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42837004What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.