ArticleUrolithiasis2026
Preoperative CT-based markers and inflammatory parameters as predictors of failed ureteroscopic access in unstented patients with ureteral stones: a prospective single-center cohort study.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Failed ureteroscopic access (FA) in unstented patients remains a significant clinical challenge. We aimed to identify preoperative clinical, laboratory, and CT-based predictors of FA, determine optimal cutoff values, and develop a clinically applicable risk-stratification model. This prospective cohort study enrolled 141 consecutive patients with ureteral stones undergoing unstented ureteroscopy (83 semi-rigid, 58 flexible) at a tertiary center (January 2024-January 2025). Preoperative demographics, pain characteristics, inflammatory markers (TLC, ESR, CRP, procalcitonin), and NCCT parameters (stone size, density, ureteral wall thickness [UWT], perinephric fat stranding [PFS] grade, hydronephrosis grade, HU of hydronephrosis, renal parenchymal thickness) were compared between successful access (SA, n = 112) and failed access (FA, n = 29) groups. Firth's penalized logistic regression, ROC analysis with DeLong comparison, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed. FA occurred in 29 patients (20.6%). UWT demonstrated the highest discriminatory power (AUC 0.965; cutoff ≥ 2.7 mm; sensitivity 96.6%, specificity 99.1%), followed by PFS grade (AUC 0.963; cutoff ≥ 2; sensitivity 100%, specificity 89.3%) and procalcitonin (AUC 0.957; cutoff ≥ 0.2 ng/mL). On Firth's penalized multivariate analysis, the primary two-variable Firth model identified UWT (OR 62.20 per mm; p < 0.001) and upper ureteral location (OR 14.27; p = 0.040) as independently associated with failed access (apparent AUC 0.986; 5-fold cross-validated AUC 0.967). The combined model achieved an AUC of 0.997 as an exploratory model with adequate calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, p = 0.936). Exploratory DCA suggested potential net benefit across clinically relevant threshold probabilities. UWT ≥ 2.7 mm and PFS grade ≥ 2 on preoperative NCCT may be useful predictors of FA during unstented ureteroscopy, although these findings require external validation before clinical application. Incorporating these readily measurable CT parameters into a proposed preoperative risk-stratification algorithm may optimise surgical planning and patient counselling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42837000What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.