ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Alternative lengthening of telomeres in small well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: independent validation and cross-platform concordance.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors measuring ≤ 2 cm (small PanNETs) are usually non-functional and most are discovered incidentally. While most are indolent, some behave aggressively and metastasize. Alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) has shown promise as a predictive biomarker of recurrence in recent studies. We designed a multi-institutional study to validate the predictive ability of ALT in small PanNET to inform patient selection for operative versus non-operative management. We identified 172 cases of small PanNET diagnosed from 2001 to 2021 in four different institutions. ALT fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) could be performed in 133 cases and was compared with clinical outcomes. Among those with FISH, 44.4% were females with a mean age of 65.4 years (range 31-88). Twenty-one cases (15.8%) were ALT-positive. Over a median follow-up of 48 months, a total of 19 progressions (metastasis, recurrence, increase in size, or death) were recorded. ALT positivity was significantly associated with worse progression-free survival [PFS]. In the ALT-positive group, a total of 9 cases showed progression compared to 10 in the ALT-negative group (5-year PFS: 70.2% vs. 88.8%, hazard ratio: 4.69, p = 0.002). In a separate analysis using matched cases, ALT chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), demonstrated high concordance with ALT FISH (95.5% for positive and 91.7% for negative cases) enabling cross-platform validation. Unlike FISH, CISH can be interpreted using standard bright field microscopy, facilitating broader implementation. These findings support further evaluation of ALT testing, particularly via CISH, as a potentially scalable and accessible biomarker, while recognizing that formal analytic validation and confirmation in unselected cohorts are required before routine clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42836995What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.